Sunday, November 25, 2012

Stanislavski


Stanislavski, Stanislavski – my first introduction to him was when Mrs. Moon mentioned him to me in ninth grade on the London Theatre Discovery Week trip. I came back from Europe with a whole book on his practice and advice to actors. I hope this presentation will grant me a better understanding of his philosophy.

Constatin Stanislavski
Born January 5th, 1863 as Konstatin Sergeyeich Alekseyev in Moscow, Russia

           Influences on Peter Brook
-       Childhood theater troupe
-       Tomasso Salvini playing Othello in 1882
-       Mikhail Shchepkin (1788-1863)
-       Ernesto Rossi; told Stanislavski that his acting needed art
-        Let him discover the ‘life’ in a role
-        Stanislavski developed the idea of a realistic set in 1898 with Hauptemann’s The Sunken Bell
Key Philosophies
-       “A system is not a hand-me-down suit that you can put on and walk off in, or a cook-book where all you need to find the page and there is your recipe. No, it is a whole way of life…”
-       Key Principles
-       Analysis
-       Perception
-       Experience
-       Objective/Purpose
-       Belief
-       Discipline
-       Realism/Naturalism
-       Definition:
-       Realism – selection and distillation of observations of daily life; capturing the essence of life
-       Naturalism – ‘exposing a slice of life’ and portraying the intricacies of the world; complete attention to detail
-       Terms are generally used synonymously, but they are different
-       Ardent supporter of detail
-       Detested ‘meaningless’ avant-garde
-       Physical Realism
-       Sometimes overrepresented details
-       Lived for character research
-       Psychological Realism
-       Acknowledge the emotional subtext of the characters
-       All action must have a purpose and meaning
-       Always be analyzing your actions
-       Who are you? (funnily enough, this is what I do every time I make a character for a roleplay or a story >w>)
-       Where do you come from?
-       What do you want?
-       Why are you doing this?
-       Where are you going?
-       What will you do when you get there?
-       Outward action (physical) & Inward action
-       The actors is Never unengaged
-       IT MUST HAVE A WHY
-       The Magic If – a way of creating new context
-        The context creates the subtext (oh, I love this >w<)
-       Believe in what is happening onstage
-       Emotion Memory
-       The most controversial part of Stanislavski’s system
-       ‘Scars on the nervous system’
-       Actors should make an effort to broaden their range of experience
-       Recreation > Imitation
-       ‘Always and forever, when you are on stage, you must play yourself. But it will be in an infinite variety of combinations of objectives, and given circumstances which you have prepared for your part, and which have been smelted in the furnace of your emotion memory’.
-       The most difficult and dangerous aspect of the System
-       Stanislavski later disavowed this aspect of his System in 1930
-       Movement, Tempo, Rhythm
-       “Wherever there is life, there is action; wherever action, movement; where movement, tempo; and where there is tempo, there is rhythm.”
-       Every character/actor has his or her own tempo/rhythm
-       Rhythms must be distinct
-       Rhythms can drive a performance
-       Stillness is a powerful instrument
-       Other Aspects of Stanislavski’s System
-       Circle of Attention – helps an actor relax and refocus himself and his character, like the ripples of a pond where the focal point of the ripples is the actor.
-       Units and Objectives – plays can be broken down into Units of Action
Manifestations of the Philosophy
-       Collaborated with…
-       Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko (Moscow Art Theater)
-       Anton Chekhov, the writer of “The Seagull” and Leo Tolstoy, writer of “What is Art?”
-        Chekhov made subtler, emotionally charged projects after he learned upon understanding the implied messages hidden in the writing. This idea was shared by both Stanislavski and Chekhov.
-        Tolstoy influenced Stanislavski, which art had to be simplified and available for all. This helped form the thinking of Stanislavski.
-       The Society of Art and Literature (1888)
-       Stanislavsky, A.F. Fedotov, F.P. Komissarzhevskii, F.L. Sologuh
-       Create a society where they portray acting in a redefining way.
-       Moscow Art Theater (1898)
-       Moscow, Russia’s most valued company
-       Many classic performances all depicting a sense of realism
-       January 17th, 1904 – written by Anton Chekhov but directed by Stanislavski,
-        Cherry Orchard
-       “A man who didn’t find acting through reality, yet reality through acting” – Austin

Oh, I loved the activity. There are just sooooo many options! I hope we can do it again soon, because I really love subtext and there were just so many unrepresented scenarios running through  my head!

Also, I forgot to ask: Stanislavski, or Stanislavsky? 

Peter Brook


I already have a base knowledge on Peter Brook thanks to his book, The Empty Space, but that is all it is: base. Basic. There’s so much more to Brook than I know now, and hopefully this presentation will help me to understand him and his teachings in a stronger way.

Peter Brook: Randomly Relatable
           Influences on Peter Brook
-       Interested in film as a child and in present day
-       Interested in Jean Paul Sarte
-       Gurdijeff
-       Gordon Craig
-       Artaud (Theater of Cruelty)
-        Push to mental, physical, and emotional limits.
-       Merce Cunningham
Key Philosophies
-       Theater should be Relatable
-       Everyone should understand
-       The power of words (different aims for different purposes)
-       Use incredible phrases like the end of a whip
-       Truest expression is ‘silence’
-       A certain degree of applause or laughter
Manifestations of the Philosophy
-       King Lear (1962)
-       Extraordinary Theater with the Royal Shakespeare Company
-       Trusted actors
-       Experimentation
-       Outlandish rehearsal techniques
-       Director as designer
-       Simplification
-       Salvador Dali
-       Salome
-       Christopher Fry
-       Ring Around the Moon

More than any of these notes, I think that the group’s adaptation of the Korean folktale into a short play was able to convey the true essence of Brook’s philosophy to me more clearly than the powerpoint and handout combined.

[will elaborate when there is time and I don't feel ill ><]

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Theater and the World Notes


(Uh... these will be incoherent to everyone but myself, probably xD)

Post Modernism
l   Self Reflection
-            Paying homage to itself
-            Take material from the past and re-envision it
l   How do we view…
-            Post Modernism comes from the unrealistic
-            Realism à Naturalism à Surrealism à Post Modernism
l   No multiple theme – experimentation and multiple themes
l   First  postmodernist play = Dada/Dadaism
-            A Dadaist poet is like they get a group of words and throw them in the air, making a poem of the words they collect in the order they do so.
l   Theater of the Absurd
-            Post-war
-            Loss, disillusioned
l   Non-linearism
-            Watch the movie Memento
l   Open Theater
-            Joseph Chaiken: started open theater in the 1960s and 70s
-            Open gender roles, actors are actors playing a role – characters are not alive
l   Women
-            Sarah Ruhl
-            Mary Zimmerman
-            Susan Lorry Parks
-            Sarah Jones
-            One-woman play of fifteen different ethnic groups
l   Non-traditional Casting
l   Globe Theater
-            Upheaval, freedom
-            What kind of response can we get?
-            International focus
-            International interest
l   Macaronic Theater
-            Bodies, gestures, ‘macro=close up’
-            Assimilation, inter-cultural life
-            Focuses on cultural problems
-            AIDs (Angels in America)(Philadelphia)
-            Burktel Brekt (Meryl Streep & Tony Kushner) – The War of Art
l   Spectacular Theater
-            Cirque de Soleil
-            Not the spectacle that which is seen, but something completely spectacular
l   Theatre of Community
-            Clifford Odets/Group Theatre: Waiting for Lefty
-            Cornerstone Theater by Harvard Graduates
l   Movement Art and Dance/Theater
-            Stomp
-            Blue Man Group
-            Pina Bausch
-            Matthew Bourne
l   Verbatim Theater
-            Anna Divere Smith
-            Does not act, she embodies them (L.A. Race Riots)
-            David Hare
-            Take current politics
-            Eve Ensler (Vagina Monologues; interviewed women of Serbian Wars)
-            Solo performances
l   Dangerous Theater
-            Pushing the boundaries

Norman McCleran
l   Dance performance called Norman

Natasha Tsakos
l   Up Wake


Andy Warhol
l   Pop Art (Marilyn Monroe)

Burtel Brekt
l   Director/Genius/Actor/Scriptwriter/etc.
l   Wanted to lose the relationship between the stage and the audience
l   Let the audience know that ‘this is a play’
-            Distancing


Tuesday, October 23, 2012

TPPP

Plays Seen
-          Wicked
-          The Odyssey
-          The Last Days of Judas Iscariot
-     Les Miserables
-          Phantom of the Opera
-          Cirque de Soleil (recording)
-     The Pajama Games
-     Legally Blonde
-     The Sound of Music
-     Fiddler On the Roof
-     The Book of Mormon
-     Avenue Q
-     Pirates
-     ArtiFacts
-     Pina Bausch's Movie
-     Chicago
-     Shadowland
-     American Idiot

Plays Participated In
-          The Good Soul of Szechuan
-     Romeo and Juliet

Plays Read
-          Romeo and Juliet
-          Hamlet
-          Much Ado About Noting
-     A Midsummer Night's Dream
-          Taming of the Shrew
-     Twelfth Night
-          The Phantom of the Opera
-     Les Miserables
-          The Pillowman
-          The Last Days of Judas Iscariot
-          The Crucible
-     The Good Soul of Szechuan
-     The Love of Three Oranges
-     Mother Courage and Her Children
-     Antigony
-     Yotsuba Ghost Stories

Production Work Done
-          Lighting
-     Dramaturgist

Festivals Attended
-          Seoul Performing Arts Festival
-     The World Festival of National Theaters

Types of Theater Studied
-         Practitioners
             - Stanislavski
             - Bertolt Brecht
             - Anne Bogart
             - Tadashi Suzuki
-         Postmodernist Theater
-          World Theater
-     Greek Theater
-     Physical Theater
-     Masked Theater
             - Commedia del Arte
             - Neutral Mask
             - Found Mask
             - Korean Masked Dance
-     Japanese Theater
             - Kabuki
             - Noh
             - Kyogen
             - Bunraku
             - Underground

Plays to See
-          [too many]

Sunday, October 21, 2012


The Pillowman…

The Pillowman…

How does one even begin to describe a play, a story, an idea such as The Pillowman?

This postmodernist piece, written by one Martin McDonaugh… well, I simply had no words for it when I was done. I’m not sure what I expected from it, but definitely not what I had found in it.

Well, what had spurred me to pick it up at first? I think it was largely due to the fact that the collaborative horror story I was participating in online collapsed on itself and I still longed for a fun little scare. I assumed that the story of this play would be straightforward, violent but tolerable when distanced with words and without visuals, would be simple and have jump scares sprinkled here and there throughout the plot.

… Thinking back, I severely underestimated not only the author, but postmodernism, theatre, and the power of words as a whole, didn’t I? ^^”

The Pillowman is something most would consider a ‘black comedy’. There is humor, yes, the funny bits, but there is a darkness etched into every word of the script that enshrouds the mind and wraps around the reader (or audience, I suppose, when performed), and I confess that every chuckle that left my lips was the unwilling company of a cringe. That, of course, doesn’t mean that I didn’t enjoy it – this play was astounding, amazing, and I simply couldn’t put it down…

… but it definitely didn’t leave me happy.

The darkness lingered long after I finished the play. There was no happy ending for any of the characters. There were no perfect characters, no – every character was flawed to the point of being almost pitiful yet I could muster no pity because each man (for there were ‘real’ women) was too strong in personality. I don’t want to spoil this play for anyone, because there are twists and turns in the plot, even within a limited time frame, that I want those interested to discover for themselves.

However, I believe that any fan of a good postmodernist work (who can stomach the gore, violence, and heavy atmosphere) will be able to appreciate and perhaps even enjoy this play, for there are so many different methods incorporated in the most fascinating of ways into the play.
l  Nonlinear – oh, this play is anything but linear as the reader/audience is forced to delve into the past, the future, and the imagination of the characters, back and forth, into a place where time and reality are nothing but a distortion of what it should be. Fascinating.
l  Narrator Plays a Role – the main protagonist is a writer, and in between acts he often slips into a void of reality where his stories come to life.


I have no more time for now, but I will be adding to this post later.